eated to ensure that even the strongest nations would answer to common rules. Today, that promise is visibly weakening. Military actions continue despite clear violations of international norms. Economic sanctions are applied selectively. Human rights are defended loudly in some regions and quietly ignored in others. The emerging reality is difficult to deny: global order is increasingly shaped by influence rather than law. International law was never flawless, but it functioned as a moral and legal compass. Its authority depended not on force, but on collective belief. That belief is now under strain. Selective enforcement has become one of the most corrosive threats. When powerful states violate international law, consequences are often delayed, diluted, or avoided entirely. Smaller nations, however, face swift penalties for similar actions. This imbalance has turned law into a political instrument rather than a universal standard. The United Nations, once envisioned as the ultimate guardian of peace, struggles under the weight of geopolitical rivalry. Resolutions are passed, vetoed, and ignored. Legal frameworks remain intact, but their enforcement is increasingly optional. “International law does not disappear in a single moment it fades when power learns it can act without consequence.” This erosion carries a human cost. Civilians are left unprotected, humanitarian corridors collapse, and accountability becomes symbolic rather than real. Refugees multiply, and conflicts harden without credible paths to justice. The world is drifting toward a system where legitimacy is measured by strength. Military alliances outweigh international courts. Economic leverage overshadows legal rulings. Strategic silence becomes a form of power. Perhaps the most dangerous consequence is the collapse of trust. Many nations now view international law as a tool of the powerful rather than a shield for the vulnerable. This perception fuels disengagement and accelerates the fragmentation of global cooperation. History offers a clear warning: when rules lose authority, instability follows. The question before the world is no longer whether international law is weakening—but whether nations still believe it is worth defending. 📦 EDITOR’S OPINION International law does not fail because it lacks rules—it fails when nations choose convenience over commitment. A world governed purely by power may appear effective in the short term, but it is inherently unstable. Global order cannot survive on strength alone; it requires restraint, consistency, and the courage to be bound by the same rules applied to others.