like these are deeply concerning and could destabilize ongoing peace initiatives , said a spokesperson for the Arab League. We call on the United States to reaffirm its commitment to international law and equitable solutions. The Palestinian Authority condemned the remarks as provocative and warned that they embolden unilateral actions that threaten the prospects for a two-state solution. Meanwhile, several European governments expressed dismay and urged restraint, emphasizing the delicate nature of negotiations in the region. In response, the U.S. State Department emphasized that the ambassador’s statements did not reflect official U.S. policy and reaffirmed Washington’s commitment to a negotiated peace between Israel and Palestine. “We remain steadfast in supporting a two-state solution and opposing unilateral measures that undermine dialogue,” a department official said. The controversy has sparked intense debate among policymakers and analysts in Washington with some lawmakers questioning the ambassador’s judgment and calling for increased oversight of diplomatic messaging. Diplomatic missteps of this magnitude have real-world consequences , said a senior U.S. senator on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Regional media outlets highlighted the remarks extensively, with coverage in major Middle Eastern capitals reflecting widespread public concern and outrage. Social media platforms saw trending hashtags condemning the comments, underscoring the immediate impact on public sentiment. Analysts warn that while the remarks may be officially clarified, the incident could complicate U.S. efforts to act as a neutral mediator in ongoing Israeli-Palestinian negotiations. Diplomats from both sides are reportedly working behind the scenes to manage the fallout and prevent escalation. As discussions continue, the situation highlights the sensitivity of diplomatic language in conflict zones and the broader implications for U.S. foreign policy credibility in the Middle East. Source: Financial Times