ution gives Congress primary power over taxation and trade. Legal experts say the ruling represents one of the most significant checks on presidential trade authority in decades. The decision invalidates large portions of the tariff structure introduced under Trump’s administration, potentially opening the door to legal disputes over previously collected duties. Immediate Political Response Trump sharply criticized the ruling, calling it a setback for American economic leverage. Within hours of the decision, he announced a new temporary 10% global tariff under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, which allows limited short-term trade restrictions. The temporary measure is designed to remain in effect for up to 150 days while the administration explores alternative legal pathways to maintain tariff-based trade pressure. Supporters argue the tariffs are necessary to protect domestic industries and counter unfair trade practices. Critics, however, warn that continued tariff uncertainty could strain diplomatic ties and disrupt markets. Economic Impact and Industry Concerns Business groups and importers are now reviewing the financial consequences of the ruling. Analysts suggest companies may seek refunds for duties paid under the invalidated tariff structure. Economists caution that shifting trade policies could affect supply chains, consumer prices, and international trade negotiations. Markets responded cautiously as investors weighed the long-term implications. What Happens Next? With the Supreme Court decision now firmly in place, attention shifts to Congress. Lawmakers may consider clarifying or redefining executive trade powers to prevent similar disputes in the future. Meanwhile, the administration’s newly announced temporary tariff plan signals that the broader debate over U.S. trade policy is far from over.