Muslim majority countries and regional organizations also condemned the developments, arguing that they escalate tensions and violate international norms. In coordinated statements, officials urged Israel to halt policies they say contribute to instability and inflame regional sensitivities. The United Nations echoed these concerns, with senior officials warning that continued changes to the status quo could deepen humanitarian challenges and fuel unrest. UN representatives emphasized that sustainable peace can only be achieved through dialogue and adherence to international law. Israel has defended its actions as necessary for security and governance rejecting accusations that the measures amount to annexation or breach international law. Israeli officials maintain that the final status of the West Bank should be determined through direct negotiations rather than external pressure. Critics, however, argue that the cumulative impact of recent decisions risks narrowing the space for diplomacy. Analysts note that the breadth of international criticism reflects growing unease over long-stalled peace efforts and shifting dynamics in the region. Despite mounting scrutiny, there are few indications of immediate policy changes. Diplomats say sustained international engagement rather than condemnation alone will be critical in shaping future developments.