fficials said the EU’s decision reflected double standards, pointing to what they described as Europe’s silence over Israel’s military actions in Gaza. The Foreign Ministry said the EU had failed to take meaningful action while Israeli forces continued operations that have resulted in the deaths of tens of thousands of Palestinians, including a large number of children, according to Gaza health authorities and international humanitarian organisations. “The European Union claims to defend human rights, yet remains silent in the face of mass civilian casualties elsewhere,” an Iranian official said. Adding that the bloc’s response exposed a credibility gap in its foreign policy. The EU for its part, has defended the designation as a response to the IRGC’s role in internal repression, regional military activities, and alleged involvement in actions that threaten European security. EU officials have said the measure is intended to increase pressure on Tehran and signal accountability for human rights violations. The decision aligns the EU with countries such as the United States and Canada, which have already classified the IRGC as a terrorist organisation. Under EU law, the designation allows for asset freezes and criminal penalties for providing material support to the group. Analysts say the move is likely to deepen tensions between Tehran and Brussels, complicating efforts to revive diplomatic dialogue on issues ranging from sanctions relief to regional security. Iran has indicated it may respond with reciprocal measures, though it has not yet outlined specific steps. As the conflict in Gaza continues and scrutiny of Western responses intensifies globally, Iran’s criticism highlights a broader debate over consistency in the application of international law and human rights standards, one that is increasingly shaping diplomatic confrontations beyond the Middle East. Source: Al Jazeera