y amid ongoing instability. Israeli Benjamin Netanyahu’s administration has defended the legislation as a firm response to terrorism , asserting that existing penalties have not sufficiently prevented deadly incidents. Advocates of the law also emphasize the need for stronger judicial tools in the face of escalating violence. However, critics warn that the law raises serious legal and ethical concerns. International human rights organizations have condemned the policy as discriminatory, noting that it predominantly applies to Palestinians tried in military courts, where due process standards are often questioned. Legal analysts also argue that the law may conflict with international conventions that restrict the use of capital punishment, particularly in occupied territories. This represents a dangerous escalation , said one regional legal expert. The application of the death penalty in such a context risks undermining the principles of fair trial and equal justice . Despite widespread reports circulating on social media, there is no credible evidence to support claims that thousands of Palestinians have been sentenced to death under this law. Rather the legislation establishes a legal framework that could be applied in future cases involving specific narrowly defined offenses. The passage of the law has also reignited debate within Israel. Some legal scholars and former judicial officials have expressed concern that the measure could face constitutional challenges, potentially reaching Israel’s Supreme Court. Meanwhile, international reactions have been swift. European officials and several United Nations representatives have voiced concern, urging Israel to reconsider the policy and adhere to international legal standards. Others including some political allies have acknowledged Israel’s security concerns while stopping short of endorsing the measure. As the law moves toward implementation, its real world impact remains uncertain. Observers note that legal, political and logistical hurdles could limit its application. Nonetheless, the legislation signals a hardening stance in Israeli policy and adds a new layer of complexity to an already volatile conflict. The coming months will likely determine whether the law becomes a rarely used deterrent or a frequently applied instrument of justice, one that could reshape both domestic legal norms and international perceptions of Israel’s approach to security and human rights. Source: Reuters